Journal assignment #1

Journal Assignment #1

  1. Before the Job Offer Negotiation began in class, what were you expecting in terms of:
    a. Process
    b. Timelines
    c. Outcome? (1 mark)
  2. Did the negotiation unfold the way you originally expected? Why or why not? What did you find most
    surprising or interesting about the process? (1 mark)
  3. What happened with the negotiation that positively and negatively affected the negotiation? (1 mark)
  4. Do you believe that you can negotiate without making concessions? Please refer to specific examples
    from the Bring Home the Sluggers Video to support your opinion. (2 marks)
    Please submit your completed assignment in the Moodle drop box.
    Evaluation
    The individual assignments are reflections based on your experience in and outside of class, the readings
    and the class activities. They are intended to provoke thought and reinforce learning, as such, with some
    effort, it should be quite easy to succeed on all assignments. Submission should be no less than 500
    words.
    Each journal assignment is worth 10 marks, any external material used must be cited in APA format.
    5- Excellent 4- Very Good 3 – Good
    -Student answered all
    questions in a
    comprehensive and
    complete manner. Answers
    are on topic and relate to
    course material.
    -Used specific appropriate
    examples to demonstrate a
    comprehensive
    understanding of the
    material.
    -Cited external sources to
    support an opinion. Proper
    APA formatting was used.
    -Excellent analysis of
    course material and
    connection of personal
    -Student answered all
    questions in a complete
    manner but lacked some
    depth of their
    explanations. Answers
    may not fully relate to the
    course material.
    -Used specific appropriate
    examples to demonstrate
    a good understanding of
    the material.
    -Cited external sources to
    support an opinion.
    Proper APA formatting
    was used.
    -Good analysis of course
    material and connection
    -Student answered all questions
    but further analysis would have
    been helpful.
    -The content of the answer does
    not fully reflect the question(s),
    it is slightly off topic or not
    related to course material.
    -Used non-specific examples to
    demonstrate an adequate
    understanding of the material.
    -Cited external sources to
    support an opinion.
    -Proper APA formatting was not
    used.
    -Adequate analysis of course
    material and connection of
    personal experiences to the
    experiences to the course
    content.
    -Writing was professional
    and error free.
    of personal experiences to
    the course content.
    -Writing was professional
    and less than 2 errors.
    course content. Greater detail
    was however required.
    -Writing was good and less than
    4 errors.
    2-Superficial 1 – Poor
    -Student failed to answer
    the questions in a complete
    manner.
    -The content of the answer
    does not reflect the
    question(s), it is off topic or
    not related to course
    material
    -Did not provide examples
    or did not provide relevant
    examples to demonstrate an
    understanding of the
    material.
    -Did not cite sources or
    utilized improper formatting
    -little analysis of course
    material and connection of
    personal experiences to the
    course content.
    -Writing was not acceptable.
    Problems with grammar,
    spelling or structure.
    -Student did not
    answer questions, or
    failed to adequately
    answer questions.
    -Failed to use specific
    examples to
    demonstrate a
    understanding of the
    material.
  • Did not cite sources
    or utilized improper
    formatting
    -Scant analysis of
    course material and
    lacking in connection of
    personal experiences
    to the course content.
    -Writing was
    unprofessiona