Critique of Quantitative Research Article

Research Critique, Part 2: Critique of Quantitative Research Short article The population who are diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) frequently experience daytime sleepiness and are at threat for ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, high blood pressure, and other vascular related issues (Hsu et al., 2007). There are several treatment alternatives for individuals with OSA, which are weight-loss, constant favorable airway pressure (CPAP), dental appliances, and surgery. This research study evaluates patients who have actually undergone uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) to identify enhancement and changes in surgical criteria of their upper airway using quantitative videoendoscopic computer-assisted measurement (WEBCAM) in hopes of showing enhancement in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI).

Protection of Human Participants

The authors describe this study as prospective in design. The study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of UPPP, a surgery for OSA, on patients who had surgery six months prior (Hsu et al., 2007). It is presumed every patient offered authorization for the surgery. An assumption may be made that subjects were voluntary for the post surgical study since there was no mention of further consents.

It is not specified that this research study had approval from an institutional review board from the company. The 19 male clients took part in over night pre and postoperative non-invasive polysomnnographic studies (PSG).

These tests consist of the Epworth sleepiness scale recording, WEBCAM of upper respiratory tract, and bio-data recording. PSG entails electroencephalogram (EEG), submental electromyogram (EMG), anterior tibialis EMG, electrocardiogram (ECG), thoraco-abdominal motion, oronasal air flow (expired CO2), arterial oxygen saturation with pulse oximetry, and electrooculography (EOG).

Images were recorded for contrast evaluation postoperatively. The mean age of the subjects was 40.6 years with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.4, all who had UPPP after failing the CPAP trial and other medical approaches.

Data Collection and Analysis

The major variables were labeled in association with the endoscopic photographs from the computer-assisted measurement (CAM) airway analysis at the retropalatal level with calibrator in regards to showing airway dimensions in both pre and postoperative images (Hsu et al., 2007). There was no sign of manipulation of these variables other than from the postoperative images. The research team compiled the data to show the regression data of UPPP surgery were considerably correlated with postoperative improvement. This method of data collection was used to analyze the correlation between modifications in surgical parameters and the postoperative status of OSA patients. The six-month postoperative, patients again underwent PSG, Epworth sleepiness scale recording, CAM of upper airway, and bio-data analysis.

A total of eight videoendoscopic images were taken of all 19 subjects. Patients were analyzed during quiet respiration and Mueller’s maneuver in both supine and erect positions at the retropalatal and retrolingual levels. The Mueller’s maneuver is a non-invasive procedure using fiber optic endoscopic evaluation that measures both size, shape, and collapsibility of the upper airway (Friedman, 2009). Images were captured using a videocapture card, which was installed into the computer along with digital imaging software. Transverse and longitudinal dimensions, as well as surface areas were measured using digital software to calculate the collapsibility of obstructive sites of the upper airway. Comparison was made between pre and postoperative images, which show significant improvement of the retropalatal area by 70% (Hsu et al., 2007).

Data Management and Analysis

The author indicates that the researcher who performed the upper airway measurements was not privy to patient information whether they were of preoperative or postoperative status (Hsu et al., 2007). Following UPPP, the importance (p<0.05) of change in parameters was tested using the Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The Wilcoxon’s signed-ranked test was used because there are two nominal variables (before and after) and one measurable variable (the subject) (McDonald, 2009). It was not conveyed if statistical software was utilized but simple regression was used to correlate the pre and postoperative differences in surgical limitations with the AHI to detect the parameters that would considerably improve the results of OSA surgery. Analysis of the data was straight forward in that it compared measurements of pre and postoperative images taken.

Findings/Interpretation of Findings

According to the results of the data, the researchers found there was significant improvement of the AHI in level one palatal surgery (Hsu et al., 2007). The UPPP procedure increased the retropalatal area significantly by 70%, transverse and longitudinal diameters approximately 40% and 31%, and palatal collapsibility decreased by about 60%. These findings are purposeful for physicians who would be able to foster more effective, specific upper airway treatment choices for patients with OSA. This study shows that UPPP significantly benefits patients with OSA, which decreases daytime drowsiness by allowing them to experience better nocturnal rest.

The findings could be considered an invalid reflection of reality considering the fact that the study was conducted in a sleep lab and out of the patients’ regular sleeping environment. By removing the patients from their usual sleeping environment, this can alter results due the possibility of comfortableness of sleeping in a new or different place. Limitations to the study were that only male patients were involved in the study because the number of female patients was to small to show any statistical significance (Hsu et al., 2007). The findings were coherent but it was often necessary to refer to the terminology index to understand their relationship to the images given in the article.

In regards to nursing practice, this information is valuable in the perioperative area as well as in the overweight population. The knowledge from this study greatly helps physicians and surgeons in devising more effectual, specific upper airway treatment options for patients with OSA (Hsu et al., 2007). Understanding OSA helps anesthesiologists and nursing staff in all phases of the perioperative care to ensure proper airway management. Patients could be advised to seek evaluation and treatment to improve their quality of life and avoid further health risks.

Friedman, M. (2009). Sleep apnea and snoring: Surgical and non-surgical therapy. Elsevier Health Sciences. Hsu, P., Tan, A., Tan, B., Gan, E., Chan, Y., Blair, R., & Lu, P. (2007). Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty outcome assessment with quantitative computer-assisted videoendoscopic airway analysis. Act Oto-Laryngologica, 127, 65-70. McDonald, J. H. (2009). Handbook of Biological Statistics (2nd ed.). Baltimore, Maryland: Sparky House Publishing.